LinuxSecurity.com
Share your story
The central voice for Linux and Open Source security news
Home News Topics Advisories HOWTOs Features Newsletters About Register

Welcome!
Sign up!
EnGarde Community
Login
Polls
What is the most important Linux security technology?
 
Advisories
Community
Linux Events
Linux User Groups
Link to Us
Security Center
Book Reviews
Security Dictionary
Security Tips
SELinux
White Papers
Featured Blogs
All About Linux
DanWalsh LiveJournal
Securitydistro
Latest Newsletters
Linux Security Week: May 14th, 2012
Linux Advisory Watch: May 10th, 2012
Subscribe
LinuxSecurity Newsletters
E-mail:
Choose Lists:
About our Newsletters
RSS Feeds
Get the LinuxSecurity news you want faster with RSS
Powered By

  
Google Releases Free Web Security Scanner Print E-mail
User Rating:      How can I rate this item?
Source: Information Week - Posted by Anthony Pell   
Server Security The open-source skipfish software can be used as preparation for a professional Web application security evaluation. Google on Friday released an automated Web security scanning program called skipfish to help reduce online security vulnerabilities. Though skipfish performs the same functions as other open-source scanning tools like Nikto and Nessus, Google engineer Michal Zalewski argues that skipfish has a several advantages. It operates at high speed, thanks to optimized HTTP handling and a low CPU footprint, and can easily reach 2000 requests per second, he explains in a blog post.

It's easy to use, he claims.

And, he says, it incorporates advanced security logic, which helps reduce the likelihood of generating false positives. The techniques used in skipfish are similar to those used in another security tool that Google released in 2008 called ratproxy.

"As with ratproxy, we feel that skipfish will be a valuable contribution to the information security community, making security assessments significantly more accessible and easier to execute," he says.

However, in the skipfish documentation, Zalewski notes that the software is not a silver bullet for security problems and may not be right for certain purposes. "For example, it does not satisfy most of the requirements outlined in WASC Web Application Security Scanner Evaluation Criteria," he writes. "And unlike most other projects of this type, it does not come with an extensive database of known vulnerabilities for banner-type checks."

Read this full article at Information Week

Only registered users can write comments.
Please login or register.

Powered by AkoComment!

 
< Prev   Next >
    
Partner

 

Latest Features
Password guessing with Medusa 2.0
Password guessing as an attack vector
Squid and Digest Authentication
Squid and Basic Authentication
Demystifying the Chinese Hacking Industry: Earning 6 Million a Night
Free Online security course (LearnSIA) - A Call for Help
What You Need to Know About Linux Rootkits
Review: A Practical Guide to Fedora and Red Hat Enterprise Linux - Fifth Edition
Using the sec-wall Security Proxy
sec-wall: Open Source Security Proxy
Yesterday's Edition
Bredolab botnet author sentenced to 4 years in prison in Armenia
Flaw Found in Common Network Security Technology
Partner Sponsor

Community | HOWTOs | Blogs | Features | Book Reviews | Networking
 Security Projects |  Latest News |  Newsletters |  SELinux |  Privacy |  Home
 Hardening |   About Us |   Advertise |   Legal Notice |   RSS |   Guardian Digital
(c)Copyright 2012 Guardian Digital, Inc. All rights reserved.