LinuxSecurity.com
Share your story
The central voice for Linux and Open Source security news
Home News Topics Advisories HOWTOs Features Newsletters About Register

Welcome!
Sign up!
EnGarde Community
Login
Polls
What is the most important Linux security technology?
 
Advisories
Community
Linux Events
Linux User Groups
Link to Us
Security Center
Book Reviews
Security Dictionary
Security Tips
SELinux
White Papers
Featured Blogs
All About Linux
DanWalsh LiveJournal
Securitydistro
Latest Newsletters
Linux Advisory Watch: February 10th, 2012
Linux Security Week: February 6th, 2012
Subscribe
LinuxSecurity Newsletters
E-mail:
Choose Lists:
About our Newsletters
RSS Feeds
Get the LinuxSecurity news you want faster with RSS
Powered By

  
New approaches to virus protection Print E-mail
User Rating:      How can I rate this item?
Source: H Security - Posted by Alex   
Security Projects The Internet Storm Center (ISC) has made the effort to list the hash values of around 40 million programs contained in the US National Software Reference Library (NSRL) in a database in such a way that they can be retrieved via a web front end. This potentially presents an alternative to anti-virus scanners searching for malicious code. The US NIST maintains a comprehensive collection of known programs and generates hash values of the files they contain. These allow the files to be identified conclusively. At present, the collection is mainly used for excluding standard files in forensic investigations. However, it could also be used for avoiding problems such as false alarms triggered by standard files.

For example, on Monday anti-virus vendors sounded a false alarm saying that a file belonging to AutoCAD, AcSignApply.exe contained mailware; If Avira, Kaspersky, F-Secure and other anti-virus vendors had queried the NIST database beforehand they would have known that the NIST lists the AcSignApply.exe file as a known AutoCAD file with an MD5 hash value of 5A3DA649CBBB4502559AA24972E0F302. While this is no automatic guarantee that the file doesn't include some sort of back door, it would at least have allowed the vendors to avoid a false alarm apparently based on very weak evidence.

Read this full article at H Security

Only registered users can write comments.
Please login or register.

Powered by AkoComment!

 
< Prev   Next >
    
Partner

 

Latest Features
Password guessing with Medusa 2.0
Password guessing as an attack vector
Squid and Digest Authentication
Squid and Basic Authentication
Demystifying the Chinese Hacking Industry: Earning 6 Million a Night
Free Online security course (LearnSIA) - A Call for Help
What You Need to Know About Linux Rootkits
Review: A Practical Guide to Fedora and Red Hat Enterprise Linux - Fifth Edition
Using the sec-wall Security Proxy
sec-wall: Open Source Security Proxy
Yesterday's Edition
Hackers Hit Apple Supplier Foxconn, Leak Usernames And Passwords
Hackers Mug Google's Wallet App on Rooted Android Devices
Google Chrome will no longer check for revoked SSL certificates online
Have Your Users' Passwords Already Been Hacked?
DDoS Tools Flourish, Give Attackers Many Options
Partner Sponsor

Community | HOWTOs | Blogs | Features | Book Reviews | Networking
 Security Projects |  Latest News |  Newsletters |  SELinux |  Privacy |  Home
 Hardening |   About Us |   Advertise |   Legal Notice |   RSS |   Guardian Digital
(c)Copyright 2012 Guardian Digital, Inc. All rights reserved.