LinuxSecurity.com
Share your story
The central voice for Linux and Open Source security news
Home News Topics Advisories HOWTOs Features Newsletters About Register

Welcome!
Sign up!
EnGarde Community
Login
Polls
What is the most important Linux security technology?
 
Advisories
Community
Linux Events
Linux User Groups
Link to Us
Security Center
Book Reviews
Security Dictionary
Security Tips
SELinux
White Papers
Featured Blogs
All About Linux
DanWalsh LiveJournal
Securitydistro
Latest Newsletters
Linux Advisory Watch: February 10th, 2012
Linux Security Week: February 6th, 2012
Subscribe
LinuxSecurity Newsletters
E-mail:
Choose Lists:
About our Newsletters
RSS Feeds
Get the LinuxSecurity news you want faster with RSS
Powered By

  
Crypto-Gram Newsletter, May 2009 Print E-mail
User Rating:      How can I rate this item?
Source: Bruce Schneier - Posted by Dave Wreski   
Cryptography A free monthly newsletter providing summaries, analyses, insights, and commentaries on security: computer and otherwise.

  • Fourth Annual Movie-Plot Threat Contest Winner
  • Book Review: The Science of Fear
  • An Expectation of Online Privacy
  • News
  • Malicious Contamination of the Food Supply
  • Unfair and Deceptive Data Trade Practices
  • Schneier News
  • Mathematical Illiteracy
  • Conficker
  • Comments from Readers

Great discussion of the Google, Facebook, and other online sites, and their terms of service.Take Google, for example. Last month, the Electronic Privacy Information Center (I'm on its board of directors) filed a complaint with the Federal Trade Commission concerning Google's cloud computing services. On its website, Google repeatedly assures customers that their data is secure and private, while published vulnerabilities demonstrate that it is not. Google's not foolish, though; its Terms of Service explicitly disavow any warranty or any liability for harm that might result from Google's negligence, recklessness, malevolent intent, or even purposeful disregard of existing legal obligations to protect the privacy and security of user data. EPIC claims that's deceptive.

Facebook isn't much better. Its plainly written (and not legally binding) Statement of Principles contains an admirable set of goals, but its denser and more legalistic Statement of Rights and Responsibilities undermines a lot of it. One research group who studies these documents called it "democracy theater": Facebook wants the appearance of involving users in governance, without the messiness of actually having to do so. Deceptive.

Read this full article at Bruce Schneier

Only registered users can write comments.
Please login or register.

Powered by AkoComment!

 
< Prev   Next >
    
Partner

 

Latest Features
Password guessing with Medusa 2.0
Password guessing as an attack vector
Squid and Digest Authentication
Squid and Basic Authentication
Demystifying the Chinese Hacking Industry: Earning 6 Million a Night
Free Online security course (LearnSIA) - A Call for Help
What You Need to Know About Linux Rootkits
Review: A Practical Guide to Fedora and Red Hat Enterprise Linux - Fifth Edition
Using the sec-wall Security Proxy
sec-wall: Open Source Security Proxy
Yesterday's Edition
Hackers Hit Apple Supplier Foxconn, Leak Usernames And Passwords
Hackers Mug Google's Wallet App on Rooted Android Devices
Google Chrome will no longer check for revoked SSL certificates online
Have Your Users' Passwords Already Been Hacked?
DDoS Tools Flourish, Give Attackers Many Options
Partner Sponsor

Community | HOWTOs | Blogs | Features | Book Reviews | Networking
 Security Projects |  Latest News |  Newsletters |  SELinux |  Privacy |  Home
 Hardening |   About Us |   Advertise |   Legal Notice |   RSS |   Guardian Digital
(c)Copyright 2012 Guardian Digital, Inc. All rights reserved.