LinuxSecurity.com
Share your story
The central voice for Linux and Open Source security news
Home News Topics Advisories HOWTOs Features Newsletters About Register

Welcome!
Sign up!
EnGarde Community
Login
Polls
Is Mandatory Access Control Too Much Security For Enterprise's Linux?
 
Advisories
Community
Linux Events
Linux User Groups
Link to Us
Security Center
Book Reviews
Security Dictionary
Security Tips
SELinux
White Papers
Featured Blogs
Emily Ratliff: OS Security
DanWalsh LiveJournal
Security Bloggers Network
Latest Newsletters
Linux Advisory Watch: October 10th, 2008
Linux Security Week: October 6th, 2008
Subscribe
LinuxSecurity Newsletters
E-mail:
Choose Lists:
About our Newsletters
RSS Feeds
Get the LinuxSecurity news you want faster with RSS
Powered By

  
Is Linux the Most Secure OS? Print E-mail
User Rating:      How can I rate this item?
Source: Techrepublic.com - Posted by Bill Keys   
Security Linux-based systems get a lot of press in IT trade publications. A lot of that press relates to its security characteristics. In fact, some claim “Linux is the most secure operating system (OS) of them all.” Such statements are, of course, unsupportable hyperbole; while many Linux distributions may outshine both MS Windows and Apple MacOS X by a significant margin, there’s evidence to suggest that most Linux distributions are not up to the standards of FreeBSD, for instance — let alone OpenBSD, with possibly the best security record of any general-purpose operating system. This article looks at the question of is Linux the most secure OS? What do you think? Sometime I feel that the OS is only as secure as the person using it and setting it up. But one thing is for sure is that the Open Source community gives the user the tools to make their setup as secure as they want it to be.

Read this full article at Techrepublic.com

Comments
AgreeWritten by MIke on 2008-06-19 08:32:00
I agree once system is only as secure as the user using it.
Written by Telek on 2008-06-19 16:15:29
I disagree, totally the article is comparing apples with oranges, Linux runs many kinds of software, it has more drivers, there is more code, that means more bugs, While I like BSD, software and driver wise can not compare to Linux, it would be like locking an 8086 in a waterproof safe and sending down to the lower depths of the ocean. BSD is very secure, but without being as functional, so really it has not balanced things out, it just took the secure route, Linux tried to balance things out, security and being extremely flexible at the same time.  
 
I would say Linux still holds the more secure title as Desktop only, To be fair BSD is pretty much solid in the server area, but that nice and dandy if it had as many drivers and as much software I am willing to bet the security will not scale too well.

Write Comment
  • Please keep the topic of messages relevant to the subject of the article.
  • Personal verbal attacks will be deleted.
  • Please don't use comments to plug your web site.. Such material will be removed.
Name:
Title:
Comment:

Code:* Code

Powered by AkoComment!

 
< Prev   Next >
    
Partner:

 

Latest Features
Never Installed a Firewall on Ubuntu? Try Firestarter
Review: Hacking Exposed Linux, Third Edition
Security Features of Firefox 3.0
Review: The Book of Wireless
April 2008 Open Source Tool of the Month: sudo
Open Source Tool of March: ZoneMinder
Meet the Anti-Nmap: PSAD
Yesterday's Edition
Billy Hoffman On AJAX Security and Browser Attacks

QuickLinks: Comunity , HOWTOs , Blogs , Features , Book Reviews , Networking ,
  Security Projects ,   Latest News ,  Newsletters ,  SELinux ,  Privacy ,  Home,
 Hardening ,   About Us,   Advertise,   Legal Notice,   RSS,   Guardian Digital

(c)Copyright 2008 Guardian Digital, Inc. All rights reserved.