LinuxSecurity.com
Share your story
The central voice for Linux and Open Source security news
Home News Topics Advisories HOWTOs Features Newsletters About Register

Welcome!
Sign up!
EnGarde Community
Login
Polls
Is Mandatory Access Control Too Much Security For Enterprise's Linux?
 
Advisories
Community
Linux Events
Linux User Groups
Link to Us
Security Center
Book Reviews
Security Dictionary
Security Tips
SELinux
White Papers
Featured Blogs
Emily Ratliff: OS Security
DanWalsh LiveJournal
Security Bloggers Network
Latest Newsletters
Linux Advisory Watch: September 5th, 2008
Linux Security Week: September 1st, 2008
Subscribe
LinuxSecurity Newsletters
E-mail:
Choose Lists:
About our Newsletters
RSS Feeds
Get the LinuxSecurity news you want faster with RSS
Powered By

  
How much longer does AppArmor really have? Print E-mail
User Rating:      How can I rate this item?
Source: Heise Security - Posted by Ryan Berens   
Latest News As of today, Novel has dissolved the AppArmor development team, centered around main developer, Crispin Cowan.

For a long time, AppArmor has been slow to be adopted due to the nature of its security structure (it differs from SELinux by its adherence to using names).

The issue here seems to be that without a funded back-end by Novell, how much longer does AppArmor really have? Is this a case of survival of the fittest? Could a name-based structure ever succeed? Certainly, with backing from Novell now gone, it may be safe to say that the project may only have another year. While a few distributions still include that support, will they be willing to include it in one year, without a large corporate backer?

It seems unlikely, at best, that another large organization is going to rise to take Novell's place, and without that AppArmor's days may be numbered.

Read this full article at Heise Security

Comments
UbuntuWritten by Kevin Ross on 2007-10-16 11:50:06
The next Ubuntu Gutsy Gibbon uses apparmor so maybe it will get a new breath of life from the Ubuntu front. I feel apparmor is a better alternative to SELinux because I find SELinux to be rather complex.
Agree 100% with KevinWritten by fak3r on 2007-10-16 12:07:22
While AppArmor may not be as all encompassing as SELinux, I feel having security at that lower/app level has value, and the fact that it's so much easier to setup is a big win. When I installed Gusty I looked through dmesg and saw that it was enabled by default, which I think is a great move, and a great boon for anyone using it. They don't need to set anything up, and they have more 'out of the box' security that not having it.
Nice FUD There ...Written by Crispin on 2007-10-22 22:20:12
Nice FUD job. The linked article says nothing like the summary here. AppArmor is standard in SUSE, Ubuntu, and now Mandriva. Mercenary Linix is in busines to provide AppArmor services. Far from being slow to be adopted, AppArmor uptake has been very rapid since it was open sourced. This "how much longer does AppArmor have" idea reads like wishful thinking.

Write Comment
  • Please keep the topic of messages relevant to the subject of the article.
  • Personal verbal attacks will be deleted.
  • Please don't use comments to plug your web site.. Such material will be removed.
Name:
Title:
Comment:

Code:* Code

Powered by AkoComment!

 
< Prev   Next >
    
Partner:

 

Latest Features
Review: Hacking Exposed Linux, Third Edition
Security Features of Firefox 3.0
Review: The Book of Wireless
April 2008 Open Source Tool of the Month: sudo
Open Source Tool of March: ZoneMinder
Meet the Anti-Nmap: PSAD
Open Source Tool of February: Nmap!
Yesterday's Edition
New Firefox Plug-In Double-Checks So-Called Unsafe Sites
Google Chrome Flaws Come Soon After Browser Release

QuickLinks: Comunity , HOWTOs , Blogs , Features , Book Reviews , Networking ,
  Security Projects ,   Latest News ,  Newsletters ,  SELinux ,  Privacy ,  Home,
 Hardening ,   About Us,   Advertise,   Legal Notice,   RSS,   Guardian Digital

(c)Copyright 2008 Guardian Digital, Inc. All rights reserved.