Share your story
The central voice for Linux and Open Source security news
Home News Topics Advisories HOWTOs Features Newsletters About Register

Sign up!
EnGarde Community
What is the most important Linux security technology?
Linux Events
Linux User Groups
Link to Us
Security Center
Book Reviews
Security Dictionary
Security Tips
White Papers
Featured Blogs
All About Linux
DanWalsh LiveJournal
Latest Newsletters
Linux Security Week: March 30th, 2015
Linux Advisory Watch: March 27th, 2015
LinuxSecurity Newsletters
Choose Lists:
About our Newsletters
RSS Feeds
Get the LinuxSecurity news you want faster with RSS
Powered By

How much longer does AppArmor really have? Print E-mail
User Rating:      How can I rate this item?
Source: Heise Security - Posted by Ryan Berens   
Latest News As of today, Novel has dissolved the AppArmor development team, centered around main developer, Crispin Cowan.

For a long time, AppArmor has been slow to be adopted due to the nature of its security structure (it differs from SELinux by its adherence to using names).

The issue here seems to be that without a funded back-end by Novell, how much longer does AppArmor really have? Is this a case of survival of the fittest? Could a name-based structure ever succeed? Certainly, with backing from Novell now gone, it may be safe to say that the project may only have another year. While a few distributions still include that support, will they be willing to include it in one year, without a large corporate backer?

It seems unlikely, at best, that another large organization is going to rise to take Novell's place, and without that AppArmor's days may be numbered.

Read this full article at Heise Security

UbuntuWritten by Kevin Ross on 2007-10-16 11:50:06
The next Ubuntu Gutsy Gibbon uses apparmor so maybe it will get a new breath of life from the Ubuntu front. I feel apparmor is a better alternative to SELinux because I find SELinux to be rather complex.
Agree 100% with KevinWritten by fak3r on 2007-10-16 12:07:22
While AppArmor may not be as all encompassing as SELinux, I feel having security at that lower/app level has value, and the fact that it's so much easier to setup is a big win. When I installed Gusty I looked through dmesg and saw that it was enabled by default, which I think is a great move, and a great boon for anyone using it. They don't need to set anything up, and they have more 'out of the box' security that not having it.
Nice FUD There ...Written by Crispin on 2007-10-22 22:20:12
Nice FUD job. The linked article says nothing like the summary here. AppArmor is standard in SUSE, Ubuntu, and now Mandriva. Mercenary Linix is in busines to provide AppArmor services. Far from being slow to be adopted, AppArmor uptake has been very rapid since it was open sourced. This "how much longer does AppArmor have" idea reads like wishful thinking.

Only registered users can write comments.
Please login or register.

Powered by AkoComment!

< Prev   Next >


Latest Features
Peter Smith Releases Linux Network Security Online
Securing a Linux Web Server
Password guessing with Medusa 2.0
Password guessing as an attack vector
Squid and Digest Authentication
Squid and Basic Authentication
Demystifying the Chinese Hacking Industry: Earning 6 Million a Night
Free Online security course (LearnSIA) - A Call for Help
What You Need to Know About Linux Rootkits
Review: A Practical Guide to Fedora and Red Hat Enterprise Linux - Fifth Edition
Yesterday's Edition
Feds Charged With Stealing Money During Silk Road Investigation
EFF questions US government's software flaw disclosure policy
Hotel Router Vulnerability A Reminder Of Untrusted WiFi Risks
Partner Sponsor

Community | HOWTOs | Blogs | Features | Book Reviews | Networking
 Security Projects |  Latest News |  Newsletters |  SELinux |  Privacy |  Home
 Hardening |   About Us |   Advertise |   Legal Notice |   RSS |   Guardian Digital
(c)Copyright 2015 Guardian Digital, Inc. All rights reserved.