LinuxSecurity.com
Share your story
The central voice for Linux and Open Source security news
Home News Topics Advisories HOWTOs Features Newsletters About Register

Welcome!
Sign up!
EnGarde Community
Login
Polls
Is Mandatory Access Control Too Much Security For Enterprise's Linux?
 
Advisories
Community
Linux Events
Linux User Groups
Link to Us
Security Center
Book Reviews
Security Dictionary
Security Tips
SELinux
White Papers
Featured Blogs
Emily Ratliff: OS Security
DanWalsh LiveJournal
Security Bloggers Network
Latest Newsletters
Linux Advisory Watch: September 5th, 2008
Linux Security Week: September 1st, 2008
Subscribe
LinuxSecurity Newsletters
E-mail:
Choose Lists:
About our Newsletters
RSS Feeds
Get the LinuxSecurity news you want faster with RSS
Powered By

  
Who's the BOSS? Print E-mail
User Rating:      How can I rate this item?
Posted by Ryan   
Latest News The BOSSIES, or Best of Open Source Software awards, are a yearly ranking of some of the highest ranked open source tools and projects. In this year's Security category, they included many, but not all, of the best tools. And although they didn't, it is, as always a great overview of what's going on in the industry. Standard winners include Snort for Intrusion detection, Nessus for scanning, ClamAV for Anti-virus, other old-timers, and a couple of new comers. But what about the manual?

The OSSTM (Open Source Security Testing Methodology Manual) winning an award? First off, this seems like a first rate organization, and I have absolutely no objection to standards/methodologies that aid in creating secure frameworks. In fact, they should be applauded for the kind of behavior they are fostering.

That aside, do they qualify as an open source project? Is this the best venue to showcase? Perhaps the editors at InfoWorld wanted to show some respect to the organization, and this was the only venue to do so, but I think the awards should retain a similar format across awards. Maybe these awards are given to Open Source Organizations or Open Source projects - but should there be a difference? Perhaps the awards aren't that structured, but on a list of software projects I'd rather see a great new tool or one I haven't heard of rather than an organization. What say you?

Read this full article

Comments
I don't MindWritten by Gordon on 2007-09-11 11:38:26
Most of these lists exist to inform, not necessarily judge. I don't mind that they mentioned an organization. It has some really great depth and provides a great example to the open source community on how to build, run and display common standards for security. That being said, sure it left out some tools and other projects - but that's OK.

Write Comment
  • Please keep the topic of messages relevant to the subject of the article.
  • Personal verbal attacks will be deleted.
  • Please don't use comments to plug your web site.. Such material will be removed.
Name:
Title:
Comment:

Code:* Code

Powered by AkoComment!

 
< Prev   Next >
    
Partner:

 

Latest Features
Review: Hacking Exposed Linux, Third Edition
Security Features of Firefox 3.0
Review: The Book of Wireless
April 2008 Open Source Tool of the Month: sudo
Open Source Tool of March: ZoneMinder
Meet the Anti-Nmap: PSAD
Open Source Tool of February: Nmap!
Yesterday's Edition

QuickLinks: Comunity , HOWTOs , Blogs , Features , Book Reviews , Networking ,
  Security Projects ,   Latest News ,  Newsletters ,  SELinux ,  Privacy ,  Home,
 Hardening ,   About Us,   Advertise,   Legal Notice,   RSS,   Guardian Digital

(c)Copyright 2008 Guardian Digital, Inc. All rights reserved.