LinuxSecurity.com
Share your story
The central voice for Linux and Open Source security news
Home News Topics Advisories HOWTOs Features Newsletters About Register

Welcome!
Sign up!
EnGarde Community
Login
Polls
What is the most important Linux security technology?
 
Advisories
Community
Linux Events
Linux User Groups
Link to Us
Security Center
Book Reviews
Security Dictionary
Security Tips
SELinux
White Papers
Featured Blogs
All About Linux
DanWalsh LiveJournal
Securitydistro
Latest Newsletters
Linux Security Week: April 7th, 2014
Linux Advisory Watch: April 4th, 2014
Subscribe
LinuxSecurity Newsletters
E-mail:
Choose Lists:
About our Newsletters
RSS Feeds
Get the LinuxSecurity news you want faster with RSS
Powered By

  
Who's the BOSS? Print E-mail
User Rating:      How can I rate this item?
Posted by Ryan   
Latest News The BOSSIES, or Best of Open Source Software awards, are a yearly ranking of some of the highest ranked open source tools and projects. In this year's Security category, they included many, but not all, of the best tools. And although they didn't, it is, as always a great overview of what's going on in the industry. Standard winners include Snort for Intrusion detection, Nessus for scanning, ClamAV for Anti-virus, other old-timers, and a couple of new comers. But what about the manual?

The OSSTM (Open Source Security Testing Methodology Manual) winning an award? First off, this seems like a first rate organization, and I have absolutely no objection to standards/methodologies that aid in creating secure frameworks. In fact, they should be applauded for the kind of behavior they are fostering.

That aside, do they qualify as an open source project? Is this the best venue to showcase? Perhaps the editors at InfoWorld wanted to show some respect to the organization, and this was the only venue to do so, but I think the awards should retain a similar format across awards. Maybe these awards are given to Open Source Organizations or Open Source projects - but should there be a difference? Perhaps the awards aren't that structured, but on a list of software projects I'd rather see a great new tool or one I haven't heard of rather than an organization. What say you?

Read this full article

Comments
I don't MindWritten by Gordon on 2007-09-11 11:38:26
Most of these lists exist to inform, not necessarily judge. I don't mind that they mentioned an organization. It has some really great depth and provides a great example to the open source community on how to build, run and display common standards for security. That being said, sure it left out some tools and other projects - but that's OK.

Only registered users can write comments.
Please login or register.

Powered by AkoComment!

 
< Prev   Next >
    
Partner

 

Latest Features
Peter Smith Releases Linux Network Security Online
Securing a Linux Web Server
Password guessing with Medusa 2.0
Password guessing as an attack vector
Squid and Digest Authentication
Squid and Basic Authentication
Demystifying the Chinese Hacking Industry: Earning 6 Million a Night
Free Online security course (LearnSIA) - A Call for Help
What You Need to Know About Linux Rootkits
Review: A Practical Guide to Fedora and Red Hat Enterprise Linux - Fifth Edition
Yesterday's Edition
Hackers From China Waste Little Time in Exploiting Heartbleed
Parent gabfest Mumsnet hit by SSL bug: My heart bleeds, grins hacker
Why a hacker got paid for finding the Heartbleed bug
Partner Sponsor

Community | HOWTOs | Blogs | Features | Book Reviews | Networking
 Security Projects |  Latest News |  Newsletters |  SELinux |  Privacy |  Home
 Hardening |   About Us |   Advertise |   Legal Notice |   RSS |   Guardian Digital
(c)Copyright 2014 Guardian Digital, Inc. All rights reserved.