Is SE Linux only for Linux? - The Community's Center for Security


The central voice for Linux and Open Source security news

Welcome!

Sign up!

EnGarde Community

Polls

How strictly do your users obey your security policies?

	To the letter.
	For the most part.
	When it suits them.
	By chance.
	Not at all.

Advisories

Community

Linux Events

Linux User Groups

Link to Us

Security Center

Book Reviews

Security Dictionary

Security Tips

SELinux

White Papers

Featured Blogs

Emily Ratliff: OS Security

DanWalsh LiveJournal

Security Bloggers Network

Latest Newsletters

Linux Security Week: December 1st, 2008

Linux Advisory Watch: November 28th, 2008

LinuxSecurity Newsletters

RSS Feeds

Get the LinuxSecurity news you want faster with RSS

Is SE Linux only for Linux?

User Rating:

How can I rate this item?

Source: etbe - Posted by Bill Keys

Another example of SE Linux access controls on a non-Linux platform is the MAC framework in the TrustedBSD project. This implements SE Linux access controls on top of FreeBSD. From reading the documentation it seems that the amount of changes required to the SE Linux code base for implementation on TrustedBSD was significantly smaller than the changes required for Darwin. I was surprised to see that other Unix based operating systems are porting SELinux for example, the OpenBSD project. Since SELinux is implementing in both kernel space and user space I would think there would be a lot of core changes to SELinux to make it work on other operating systems.

Read this full article at etbe

Comments

No, it's not.

Written by Natalia on 2007-09-06 17:12:31

OpenBSD isn't porting anything from SELinux to it. The TrustedBSD project, a child project of FreeBSD, has gotten permission to port some of the SELinux code to FreeBSD and relicence it BSD so that it can actually be used, but only some of it, and none of that code is actually in the mainline FreeBSD kernel or userland.

OpenBSD has reimplemented some of what the various security projects for Linux do, but it has never gone near mandatory access controls, which developers have spoken derisively about for years now.

buh?

Written by Joshua Brindle on 2007-09-07 10:20:03

@Natalia: No, trustedbsd has not gotten permission to relicense the code under the BSD license. That would require all of the copyright holders (Tresys, Red Hat, TCS, NAI, etc) to consent and they won't (mostly Red Hat won't)

MAC Framework != SELinux

Written by Todd C. Miller on 2007-09-07 10:30:48

The MAC Framework in TrustedBSD plays a similar role to LSM in the Linux kernel. There are several TrustedBSD projects that use different security policy modules utilizing the MAC Framework. One such project is SEBSD, which is a port of the SELinux security components to TrustedBSD using the MAC Framework. Likewise, SEDarwin also utilizes the TrustedBSD MAC Framework, though the MAC Framework won't appear in an official Apple release until Leopard. With the availability of the MAC Framework in Leopard, it should be possible to re-port SEDarwin with fewer invasive changes compared to the port to Tiger.

Write Comment
Please keep the topic of messages relevant to the subject of the article. Personal verbal attacks will be deleted. Please don't use comments to plug your web site.. Such material will be removed.
Name:
Title:
Comment:
Code:*

< Prev		Next >

Partner:

Latest Features

A Secure Nagios Server

Never Installed a Firewall on Ubuntu? Try Firestarter

Review: Hacking Exposed Linux, Third Edition

Security Features of Firefox 3.0

Review: The Book of Wireless

April 2008 Open Source Tool of the Month: sudo

Open Source Tool of March: ZoneMinder

Yesterday's Edition

Linux Role in Botnets Studied

10 Mistakes New Linux Administrators Make

QuickLinks: Comunity , HOWTOs , Blogs , Features , Book Reviews , Networking ,
Security Projects , Latest News , Newsletters , SELinux , Privacy , Home,
Hardening , About Us, Advertise, Legal Notice, RSS, Guardian Digital