LinuxSecurity.com
Share your story
The central voice for Linux and Open Source security news
Home News Topics Advisories HOWTOs Features Newsletters About Register

Welcome!
Sign up!
EnGarde Community
Login
Polls
Is Mandatory Access Control Too Much Security For Enterprise's Linux?
 
Advisories
Community
Linux Events
Linux User Groups
Link to Us
Security Center
Book Reviews
Security Dictionary
Security Tips
SELinux
White Papers
Featured Blogs
Emily Ratliff: OS Security
DanWalsh LiveJournal
Security Bloggers Network
Latest Newsletters
Linux Advisory Watch: August 29th, 2008
Linux Security Week: August 25th, 2008
Subscribe
LinuxSecurity Newsletters
E-mail:
Choose Lists:
About our Newsletters
RSS Feeds
Get the LinuxSecurity news you want faster with RSS
Powered By

  
Whitebox Security Testing Using Code Scanning Print E-mail
User Rating:      How can I rate this item?
Source: Dr. Dobbs Journal - Posted by Eric Lubow   
Security Projects Whitebox testing is notoriously difficult to do. Without automatic code scanning tools, scanning the source code requires a keen eye, concentration and an enormous amount of time to scan each line for security vulnerabilities. As intruders become more sophisticated at finding security vulnerabilities and writing exploitative code, it becomes more necessary to take every precaution before shipping software.These precautions can range from security training throughout the security development lifecycle (SDLC) to using tools such as source code scanners and vulnerability scanners.

Last year, more vulnerabilities were reported in shipping software than any previous year, according to CERT. Nearly 6000 new vulnerabilities surfaced in shipped software, and the state of the industry seems grim. Despite attempts by the larger and more proactive players in the industry, like Microsoft, IBM, HP and CISCO, to incorporate security in all phases of the SDLC, the number of reported vulnerabilities continues to increase. Where are the greatest weaknesses in software security? Were nearly 2000 more vulnerabilities discovered because security trainers did not transfer their knowledge properly? Or are hackers getting better at discovering these vulnerabilities? Do software corporations rely too much on perimeter defenses, such as firewalls, intrusion detection systems, deep packet inspectors and anti virus solutions? Is it just sheer complacency? Or is it really a combination of all of these things and more?

Read this full article at Dr. Dobbs Journal

Write Comment
  • Please keep the topic of messages relevant to the subject of the article.
  • Personal verbal attacks will be deleted.
  • Please don't use comments to plug your web site.. Such material will be removed.
Name:
Title:
Comment:

Code:* Code

Powered by AkoComment!

 
< Prev   Next >
    
Partner:

 

Latest Features
Review: Hacking Exposed Linux, Third Edition
Security Features of Firefox 3.0
Review: The Book of Wireless
April 2008 Open Source Tool of the Month: sudo
Open Source Tool of March: ZoneMinder
Meet the Anti-Nmap: PSAD
Open Source Tool of February: Nmap!
Yesterday's Edition
Security Configuration Guides
Firefox 3.0's SSL Certificate Interface Meets Resistance

QuickLinks: Comunity , HOWTOs , Blogs , Features , Book Reviews , Networking ,
  Security Projects ,   Latest News ,  Newsletters ,  SELinux ,  Privacy ,  Home,
 Hardening ,   About Us,   Advertise,   Legal Notice,   RSS,   Guardian Digital

(c)Copyright 2008 Guardian Digital, Inc. All rights reserved.