LinuxSecurity.com
Share your story
The central voice for Linux and Open Source security news
Home News Topics Advisories HOWTOs Features Newsletters About Register

Welcome!
Sign up!
EnGarde Community
Login
Polls
Is Mandatory Access Control Too Much Security For Enterprise's Linux?
 
Advisories
Community
Linux Events
Linux User Groups
Link to Us
Security Center
Book Reviews
Security Dictionary
Security Tips
SELinux
White Papers
Featured Blogs
Emily Ratliff: OS Security
DanWalsh LiveJournal
Security Bloggers Network
Latest Newsletters
Linux Security Week: October 6th, 2008
Linux Advisory Watch: October 3rd, 2008
Subscribe
LinuxSecurity Newsletters
E-mail:
Choose Lists:
About our Newsletters
RSS Feeds
Get the LinuxSecurity news you want faster with RSS
Powered By

  
The Holdup On DNSSEC Print E-mail
User Rating:      How can I rate this item?
Source: Dark Reading - Posted by Eric Lubow   
Server Security When you type in a hostname like www.example.com, your computer's resolver looks in its local cache and uses the information found there, then it sends the query to a name server that it has defined. That DNS server is then responsible for resolving the name and sending the response to your computer. If the DNS server doesn't have the name in the local cache, then it starts at one of the root servers and works its way down to a so-called authoritative name server for that host name. Pretty straightforward -- and, as a distributed database, the DNS (I use "the DNS" to mean "the distributed name service" in general, not a specific DNS server) is pretty effective. But as security wonks, we care about the veracity of the data, and as DNS is deployed today, we can't even begin to verify DNS data.

The DNS is a distributed data base with authoritative servers assigned to zones. A zone is just a named part of the DNS -- google.com is a zone, yahoo.com is a zone, darkreading.com is a zone, .com is a zone (so is "." but never mind that). URLs like www.google.com, www.yahoo.com, www.darkreading.com are all hosts within their respective zones. The question you should be asking is how do you know that a DNS server, say ns1.google.com, that identifies itself as authoritative for a name (a zone, actually) really is authoritative? Because it says so? Piffle. A DNS server says it's authoritative for a zone if it has a zone configured. You can check me out on this by configuring your DNS server with the google.com zone name, add in a host called www, and then use dig or nslookup to look up the host from your new DNS server. The response will come back as authoritative.

Read this full article at Dark Reading

Write Comment
  • Please keep the topic of messages relevant to the subject of the article.
  • Personal verbal attacks will be deleted.
  • Please don't use comments to plug your web site.. Such material will be removed.
Name:
Title:
Comment:

Code:* Code

Powered by AkoComment!

 
< Prev   Next >
    
Partner:

 

Latest Features
Never Installed a Firewall on Ubuntu? Try Firestarter
Review: Hacking Exposed Linux, Third Edition
Security Features of Firefox 3.0
Review: The Book of Wireless
April 2008 Open Source Tool of the Month: sudo
Open Source Tool of March: ZoneMinder
Meet the Anti-Nmap: PSAD
Yesterday's Edition
The Top 10 Security Land Mines

QuickLinks: Comunity , HOWTOs , Blogs , Features , Book Reviews , Networking ,
  Security Projects ,   Latest News ,  Newsletters ,  SELinux ,  Privacy ,  Home,
 Hardening ,   About Us,   Advertise,   Legal Notice,   RSS,   Guardian Digital

(c)Copyright 2008 Guardian Digital, Inc. All rights reserved.