LinuxSecurity.com
Share your story
The central voice for Linux and Open Source security news
Home News Topics Advisories HOWTOs Features Newsletters About Register

Welcome!
Sign up!
EnGarde Community
Login
Polls
How strictly do your users obey your security policies?
 
Advisories
Community
Linux Events
Linux User Groups
Link to Us
Security Center
Book Reviews
Security Dictionary
Security Tips
SELinux
White Papers
Featured Blogs
Emily Ratliff: OS Security
DanWalsh LiveJournal
Security Bloggers Network
Latest Newsletters
Linux Security Week: December 1st, 2008
Linux Advisory Watch: November 28th, 2008
Subscribe
LinuxSecurity Newsletters
E-mail:
Choose Lists:
About our Newsletters
RSS Feeds
Get the LinuxSecurity news you want faster with RSS
Powered By

  
Protecting against undefined exploits and security threats Print E-mail
User Rating:      How can I rate this item?
Source: Security Park - Posted by Pax Dickinson   
Intrusion Detection There is a wealth of tools available to help protect the enterprise from security threats. Firewalls, virtual private networks, strong user authentication, encryption, intrusion detection/prevention systems (IDS/IPS), email filters, antivirus, vulnerability scanners are all options. Each of these point solutions is capable of addressing a specific element of the security mosaic. In order to address their limitations many enterprises attempt to aggregate these solutions in a futile attempt to achieve effective IT security.

In isolation or even together, however, these tools are ineffective against unknown, targeted or blended attacks. That is to say, a previously undefined exploit requires the vendor to develop a system security patch, during which time, the undefined attack will propagate, unchecked, throughout the enterprise. If this happens to be your network your enterprise will be on the security front line - open to virus and hacker attacks and unable to maintain normal business activity. From a corporate governance standpoint, this lack of security control is simply unacceptable.

The downside of this deterministic or signature-based approach is that it is increasingly difficult to track, let alone manage the volumes of alerts coming daily from multiple sources. Corporate governance, however, demands that these alerts are managed using formal and auditable IT risk management processes with timely and meaningful security outcomes. The corollary being that in an increasingly complex and networked world the risks to the enterprise have become increasingly debilitating and while the fundamentals of managing these risks have changed little.

Read this full article at Security Park

Write Comment
  • Please keep the topic of messages relevant to the subject of the article.
  • Personal verbal attacks will be deleted.
  • Please don't use comments to plug your web site.. Such material will be removed.
Name:
Title:
Comment:

Code:* Code

Powered by AkoComment!

 
< Prev   Next >
    
Partner:

 

Latest Features
A Secure Nagios Server
Never Installed a Firewall on Ubuntu? Try Firestarter
Review: Hacking Exposed Linux, Third Edition
Security Features of Firefox 3.0
Review: The Book of Wireless
April 2008 Open Source Tool of the Month: sudo
Open Source Tool of March: ZoneMinder
Yesterday's Edition
Data Encryption and Ubuntu

QuickLinks: Comunity , HOWTOs , Blogs , Features , Book Reviews , Networking ,
  Security Projects ,   Latest News ,  Newsletters ,  SELinux ,  Privacy ,  Home,
 Hardening ,   About Us,   Advertise,   Legal Notice,   RSS,   Guardian Digital

(c)Copyright 2008 Guardian Digital, Inc. All rights reserved.