LinuxSecurity.com
Share your story
The central voice for Linux and Open Source security news
Home News Topics Advisories HOWTOs Features Newsletters About Register

Welcome!
Sign up!
EnGarde Community
Login
Polls
What is the most important Linux security technology?
 
Advisories
Community
Linux Events
Linux User Groups
Link to Us
Security Center
Book Reviews
Security Dictionary
Security Tips
SELinux
White Papers
Featured Blogs
All About Linux
DanWalsh LiveJournal
Securitydistro
Latest Newsletters
Linux Advisory Watch: March 6th, 2010
Linux Advisory Watch: February 26th, 2010
Subscribe
LinuxSecurity Newsletters
E-mail:
Choose Lists:
About our Newsletters
RSS Feeds
Get the LinuxSecurity news you want faster with RSS
Powered By

  
Return of the Anti-Zombies Print E-mail
User Rating:      How can I rate this item?
Source: eWeek - Posted by Pax Dickinson   
Security It's a recurring theme on security discussion lists: Someone ought to build a worm that infects insecure systems and remedies the problems on them.

Every six months or so someone thinks they're the first one to think of it. So in case any of you think it's a good idea, please stop wasting your time. It's a dreadful idea, it's been tried, and it's failed in the most miserable way. It's a Frankenstein's Monster in an e-mail attachment.

It is a tempting notion, though, and even respectable researchers have looked into it. Here's a PowerPoint presentation on "automated strike-back systems" from a BlackHat conference in 2002. The author asks a lot of the right questions, but ultimately comes up with the wrong answer. The real reason it's wrong for individuals to "strike back" at systems attacking them is because that's not how things work in a civilized society.

When you go out crime-fighting on the Internet, are you sure you're hitting back at the right target? I suggest that you shouldn't be so confident in your ability to know that you're going after the right people, without any knowledge of their circumstances and the damage you'll cause to them by tampering with their systems.

Read this full article at eWeek

Only registered users can write comments.
Please login or register.

Powered by AkoComment!

 
< Prev   Next >
    
Partner:

 

Latest Features
Introduction: Buffer Overflow Vulnerabilities
FTP Attack Case Study Part II: the Lessons
Network Security Audit (Part II)
Measuring Security IT Success
Buffer Overflow Basics
Network Intrusion Prevention Systems: When They're Valuable, and When They're Not
Hacks From Pax: Network Server Monitoring With Nmap
Yesterday's Edition
Schneier: Fight for privacy or kiss it good-bye
Password cracker 100 times faster with an SSD
Estonian DDoS revenge worm crafter jailed
Inside the mind of a Russian hacker
Flawed Security Exposes Vital Software to Hackers
Partner Sponsor

Community | HOWTOs | Blogs | Features | Book Reviews | Networking
 Security Projects |  Latest News |  Newsletters |  SELinux |  Privacy |  Home
 Hardening |   About Us |   Advertise |   Legal Notice |   RSS |   Guardian Digital
(c)Copyright 2010 Guardian Digital, Inc. All rights reserved.