LinuxSecurity.com
Share your story
The central voice for Linux and Open Source security news
Home News Topics Advisories HOWTOs Features Newsletters About Register

Welcome!
Sign up!
EnGarde Community
Login
Polls
What is the most important Linux security technology?
 
Advisories
Community
Linux Events
Linux User Groups
Link to Us
Security Center
Book Reviews
Security Dictionary
Security Tips
SELinux
White Papers
Featured Blogs
All About Linux
DanWalsh LiveJournal
Securitydistro
Latest Newsletters
Linux Security Week: September 8th, 2014
Linux Advisory Watch: September 5th, 2014
Subscribe
LinuxSecurity Newsletters
E-mail:
Choose Lists:
About our Newsletters
RSS Feeds
Get the LinuxSecurity news you want faster with RSS
Powered By

  
Why Due Diligence as a Defense is Not Enough Print E-mail
User Rating:      How can I rate this item?
Source: net-security.org - Posted by Pax Dickinson   
Security Corporate executives love two words, ‚ÄúDue Diligence‚Ä?. Unfortunately, this is only half of the required formula for meeting the requirements under ‚ÄúStandard of Care‚Ä?. It is startling when such a large percentage of these executives fail to grasp the concept and legal liability imposed under ‚ÄúDue Care‚Ä?. Due care is the second half of the formula and equally as important. For without it, the standard of care can not be measured. Performing Due Diligence shows you where your risks lie, due care is exercising the requirements discovered under due diligence to protect or mitigate exposure from those risks.

While businesses have invested in technologies such as firewalls, intrusion detection, and now intrusion prevention, we are all too familiar with FUD (Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt). How many presentations have you attended in the last six months where a security service provider discusses ‚ÄúCode Red‚Ä?, ‚ÄúNimda‚Ä? or ‚ÄúSlammer‚Ä?? The most recent of these is now two years old. So why are we still discussing them? One word, ‚Äúfear‚Ä?.

Fear of what exactly? Some might respond with, ‚ÄúDistributed Denial of Service (DDoS) attacks, Identity Theft, or the theft of intellectual property‚Ä?. All of which occur. What are the odds of it happening to your company? Better than 60% of all US businesses face civil litigation at least once in the course of their operation. According to the FBI, approximately 85% of businesses surveyed in the United States last year reported a financial loss attributed to computer/cyber attacks. With decision maker‚Äôs core focus revolving around the types of attacks and if they originated from the outside or from within, perhaps you should turn your focus on the ramifications after the attack rather than the attack itself.

Read this full article at net-security.org

Only registered users can write comments.
Please login or register.

Powered by AkoComment!

 
< Prev   Next >
    
Partner

 

Latest Features
Peter Smith Releases Linux Network Security Online
Securing a Linux Web Server
Password guessing with Medusa 2.0
Password guessing as an attack vector
Squid and Digest Authentication
Squid and Basic Authentication
Demystifying the Chinese Hacking Industry: Earning 6 Million a Night
Free Online security course (LearnSIA) - A Call for Help
What You Need to Know About Linux Rootkits
Review: A Practical Guide to Fedora and Red Hat Enterprise Linux - Fifth Edition
Yesterday's Edition
Partner Sponsor

Community | HOWTOs | Blogs | Features | Book Reviews | Networking
 Security Projects |  Latest News |  Newsletters |  SELinux |  Privacy |  Home
 Hardening |   About Us |   Advertise |   Legal Notice |   RSS |   Guardian Digital
(c)Copyright 2014 Guardian Digital, Inc. All rights reserved.