LinuxSecurity.com
Share your story
The central voice for Linux and Open Source security news
Home News Topics Advisories HOWTOs Features Newsletters About Register

Welcome!
Sign up!
EnGarde Community
Login
Polls
How strictly do your users obey your security policies?
 
Advisories
Community
Linux Events
Linux User Groups
Link to Us
Security Center
Book Reviews
Security Dictionary
Security Tips
SELinux
White Papers
Featured Blogs
Emily Ratliff: OS Security
DanWalsh LiveJournal
Security Bloggers Network
Latest Newsletters
Linux Security Week: December 1st, 2008
Linux Advisory Watch: November 28th, 2008
Subscribe
LinuxSecurity Newsletters
E-mail:
Choose Lists:
About our Newsletters
RSS Feeds
Get the LinuxSecurity news you want faster with RSS
Powered By

  
Web Sites Running On Windows NT At Risk Print E-mail
User Rating:      How can I rate this item?
Source: securitypipeline.com - Posted by Vincenzo Ciaglia   
Server Security Hundreds of thousands of Web sites running Windows NT 4 remain -- and will remain -- at risk from attack via a vulnerability patched for other operating systems a month ago, a U.S.-based security firm and a British-based Web monitoring vendor said Thursday. The bug in a key Windows protocol, Server Message Block (SMB), was patched for Windows XP, Windows Server 2003, and Windows 2000 in February, but because NT 4 had reached the end of its support lifecycle December 31, 2004, no public fix was issued by Microsoft. Microsoft does provide security patches for NT 4.0 customers who pay for custom support, a service available through the end of 2006.


However, that leaves a large number of Web sites vulnerable to hacks based on the SMB vulnerability, said Netcraft, a U.K.-based Web metrics and monitoring firm. According to Netcraft's most recent Web server survey, about 1.1 percent of Web-facing hostnames, or approximately 680,000, run on Windows NT 4.

Thousands of those hostnames, said Netcraft, are on SSL-enabled sites which may be conducting e-commerce, and thus particularly attractive to hackers.

"If your organization is unlucky enough to still have Windows NT 4.0 systems (most do) and you're not able to pay for extended support then you do not have a whole lot of options," wrote Marc Maiffret, the chief hacking officer at eEye Digital Security, in a message to the Bugtraq security mailing list.

Maiffret suggested a workaround that might mitigate some potential attacks. "...enable SMB signing. This does not truly mitigate the attack but instead it creates change in the SMB protocol that most attack tools I have seen do not support. Therefore it breaks them from being able to successfully exploit remote systems."

Read this full article at securitypipeline.com

Write Comment
  • Please keep the topic of messages relevant to the subject of the article.
  • Personal verbal attacks will be deleted.
  • Please don't use comments to plug your web site.. Such material will be removed.
Name:
Title:
Comment:

Code:* Code

Powered by AkoComment!

 
< Prev   Next >
    
Partner:

 

Latest Features
A Secure Nagios Server
Never Installed a Firewall on Ubuntu? Try Firestarter
Review: Hacking Exposed Linux, Third Edition
Security Features of Firefox 3.0
Review: The Book of Wireless
April 2008 Open Source Tool of the Month: sudo
Open Source Tool of March: ZoneMinder
Yesterday's Edition
Keeping an Eye On Your Network with PasTmon
Linux And Unix Internet Users And Site Security - How Much Is Too Much?

QuickLinks: Comunity , HOWTOs , Blogs , Features , Book Reviews , Networking ,
  Security Projects ,   Latest News ,  Newsletters ,  SELinux ,  Privacy ,  Home,
 Hardening ,   About Us,   Advertise,   Legal Notice,   RSS,   Guardian Digital

(c)Copyright 2008 Guardian Digital, Inc. All rights reserved.