LinuxSecurity.com
Share your story
The central voice for Linux and Open Source security news
Home News Topics Advisories HOWTOs Features Newsletters About Register

Welcome!
Sign up!
EnGarde Community
Login
Polls
What is the most important Linux security technology?
 
Advisories
Community
Linux Events
Linux User Groups
Link to Us
Security Center
Book Reviews
Security Dictionary
Security Tips
SELinux
White Papers
Featured Blogs
All About Linux
DanWalsh LiveJournal
Securitydistro
Latest Newsletters
Linux Advisory Watch: March 6th, 2010
Linux Advisory Watch: February 26th, 2010
Subscribe
LinuxSecurity Newsletters
E-mail:
Choose Lists:
About our Newsletters
RSS Feeds
Get the LinuxSecurity news you want faster with RSS
Powered By

  
Researchers: Digital encryption standard flawed Print E-mail
User Rating:      How can I rate this item?
Source: Builder AU - Posted by Benjamin D. Thomas   
Cryptography In a three-page research note, three Chinese scientists -- Xiaoyun Wang and Hongbo Yu of Shandong University and Yiqun Lisa Yin, a visiting researcher at Princeton University -- stated they have found a way to significantly reduce the time required to break a algorithm, known as the Secure Hashing Algorithm, or SHA-1, widely used for digital fingerprinting data files. Other cryptographers who have seen the document said that the results seemed to be genuine.

An attacker could use the flaw to create two documents or programs that have the same digital fingerprint, also known as a hash; one file could be a legitimate version of the data, while the other could be a forgery. For example, code signing -- where a program is posted online along with its SHA-1 fingerprint as a way to guarantee its integrity -- would essentially be rendered meaningless by this attack.

Read this full article at Builder AU

Only registered users can write comments.
Please login or register.

Powered by AkoComment!

 
< Prev   Next >
    
Partner:

 

Latest Features
Introduction: Buffer Overflow Vulnerabilities
FTP Attack Case Study Part II: the Lessons
Network Security Audit (Part II)
Measuring Security IT Success
Buffer Overflow Basics
Network Intrusion Prevention Systems: When They're Valuable, and When They're Not
Hacks From Pax: Network Server Monitoring With Nmap
Yesterday's Edition
Building a UNIX/Linux Incident response / Forensic Disk
What Are the Most Overrated Security Technologies?
Hackers aren't as sneaky as you think
Partner Sponsor

Community | HOWTOs | Blogs | Features | Book Reviews | Networking
 Security Projects |  Latest News |  Newsletters |  SELinux |  Privacy |  Home
 Hardening |   About Us |   Advertise |   Legal Notice |   RSS |   Guardian Digital
(c)Copyright 2010 Guardian Digital, Inc. All rights reserved.