LinuxSecurity.com
Share your story
The central voice for Linux and Open Source security news
Home News Topics Advisories HOWTOs Features Newsletters About Register

Welcome!
Sign up!
EnGarde Community
Login
Polls
What is the most important Linux security technology?
 
Advisories
Community
Linux Events
Linux User Groups
Link to Us
Security Center
Book Reviews
Security Dictionary
Security Tips
SELinux
White Papers
Featured Blogs
All About Linux
DanWalsh LiveJournal
Securitydistro
Latest Newsletters
Linux Advisory Watch: November 21st, 2014
Linux Security Week: November 17th, 2014
Subscribe
LinuxSecurity Newsletters
E-mail:
Choose Lists:
About our Newsletters
RSS Feeds
Get the LinuxSecurity news you want faster with RSS
Powered By

  
Open Source Leaving Microsoft Sitting on the Fence? Print E-mail
User Rating:      How can I rate this item?
Features The open source model, with special regard to Linux, has no doubt become a formidable competitor to the once sole giant of the software industry, Microsoft. It is expected when the market share of an industry leader becomes threatened, retaliation with new product or service offerings and marketing campaigns refuting the claims of the new found competition are inevitable. However, in the case of Microsoft, it seems they have not taken a solid or plausible position on the use of open source applications as an alternative to Windows. The open source model, with special regard to Linux, has no doubt become a formidable competitor to the once sole giant of the software industry, Microsoft. It is expected when the market share of an industry leader becomes threatened, retaliation with new product or service offerings and marketing campaigns refuting the claims of the new found competition are inevitable. However, in the case of Microsoft, it seems they have not taken a solid or plausible position on the use of open source applications as an alternative to Windows.

I read on a daily basis the latest ventures of Microsoft from the much publicized "war on Linux" to surrendering and publishing portions of their source code. In their first argument, executives of the Redmond Washington company regard Linux as everything from a "waste of money" to a threat to the well-being of the software industry. During these arguments, Microsoft executives stick by their original perception, attempting to position open source software as a less secure, less technologically sound option that does not only offer inferior solutions but is inherently bad for the financial and developmental growth of the industry. Although proved wrong time and time again by accredited analysts, journalists and customers it is a fair position for a corporation to take when their competition has them against the ropes.

However, what is puzzling to me is that Microsoft never seems to stick with that argument. Whether they are intentionally or unintentionally releasing portions of their source code to the public, they themselves have implemented a "shared source initiative" in recent years. Coincidentally, this program mirrors the benefits brought fourth by the open source development process in which segments of their source code are released to the public intended to be used as a resource for developers. Originally, backing up the view that open source was substandard and dangerous, the program operated under a "look don't touch" policy, however, in recent months the software giant has changed its tune offering participating developers the chance to modify and propose ways to improve upon the available code.

Jason Matusow, manager of Microsoft's shared source initiative defines the benefits of the program as something developers and Microsoft will benefit from. Further emphasizing his claim Matusow was quoted as saying "by allowing others to modify the code, Microsoft benefits by increasing Windows development, while programmers benefit from improved tools." Additionally, in a separate interview, he was further quoted as saying "the whole function of shared source is to learn from open-source and apply that to how we do business." The irony of this project is that it follows a similar model to that of open source development and consequentially is the exact ideal proprietary developers like Microsoft so vehemently condemn.

To create and promote a program such as Microsoft's shared source initiative, while at the same time making such harsh comments to the Linux and open source community concerning their development model, confirms the theory that the executives at Microsoft truly do see the merit in open source and find those vendors operating under that model to be a substantial threat to their business. From a consumer point of view, on the other hand, Microsoft sitting on the fence is an attempt to please everyone but, in actuality, could prove to be debilitating. How can consumers trust a company in which their whole business model and focus is skewed based on the situations and actions of a particular day?

Original text from Guardian Digital's Behind the Shield Newsletter. An archive can be found here.

Dave Wreski, CEO Guardian Digital, Inc.

Only registered users can write comments.
Please login or register.

Powered by AkoComment!

 
< Prev   Next >
    
Partner

 

Latest Features
Peter Smith Releases Linux Network Security Online
Securing a Linux Web Server
Password guessing with Medusa 2.0
Password guessing as an attack vector
Squid and Digest Authentication
Squid and Basic Authentication
Demystifying the Chinese Hacking Industry: Earning 6 Million a Night
Free Online security course (LearnSIA) - A Call for Help
What You Need to Know About Linux Rootkits
Review: A Practical Guide to Fedora and Red Hat Enterprise Linux - Fifth Edition
Yesterday's Edition
Google Releases Open Source Tool for Testing Web App Security Scanners
Most Targeted Attacks Exploit Privileged Accounts
NotCompable sets new standards for mobile botnet sophistication
Hands on with Caine Linux: Pentesting and UEFI compatible
Partner Sponsor

Community | HOWTOs | Blogs | Features | Book Reviews | Networking
 Security Projects |  Latest News |  Newsletters |  SELinux |  Privacy |  Home
 Hardening |   About Us |   Advertise |   Legal Notice |   RSS |   Guardian Digital
(c)Copyright 2014 Guardian Digital, Inc. All rights reserved.