LinuxSecurity.com
Share your story
The central voice for Linux and Open Source security news
Home News Topics Advisories HOWTOs Features Newsletters About Register

Welcome!
Sign up!
EnGarde Community
Login
Polls
What is the most important Linux security technology?
 
Advisories
Community
Linux Events
Linux User Groups
Link to Us
Security Center
Book Reviews
Security Dictionary
Security Tips
SELinux
White Papers
Featured Blogs
All About Linux
DanWalsh LiveJournal
Securitydistro
Latest Newsletters
Linux Advisory Watch: November 21st, 2014
Linux Security Week: November 17th, 2014
Subscribe
LinuxSecurity Newsletters
E-mail:
Choose Lists:
About our Newsletters
RSS Feeds
Get the LinuxSecurity news you want faster with RSS
Powered By

  
Mobile & Wireless: Security was the Watchword in 2004 Print E-mail
User Rating:      How can I rate this item?
Source: Carol Ellison - Posted by Joe Shakespeare   
Wireless Security It's no surprise that the issue that topped the Wi-Fi agenda in 2004 was the same one that's plagued it almost from its introduction. Security, or rather "lack thereof," was an inherent problem in WEP (Wired Equivalent Privacy), the native security spec in the 802.11 IEEE standard.



2004 was the long-awaited year for good news on that front, however. With the IEEE's adoption of 802.11i, the new Wi-Fi security standard that replaces WEP, security on 802.11-based Wi-Fi networks really does seem to be the equivalent of its wired counterpart.

802.11i officially replaces porous old WEP with the strong 802.1x authentication that the Wi-Fi Alliance embraced in its interim security mechanism, WPA (Wi-Fi Protected Access). The new thing it brings to the table is AES (Advanced Encryption Standard). A dramatic leap forward in data encryption on both wired and wireless platforms, AES is the encryption standard that was approved by the U.S. Department of Commerce and the National Security Agency three years earlier.

There are those who argue that 802.11i, with its powerful new encryption and an authentication mechanism that blocks rogues through a mutual authentication handshake, provides greater security than many wired networks. There may be some argument for that if you're running 802.11i within the walls of an enterprise to a given number of users who don't often take laptops on the road. But with 802.11i, the security focus is rapidly shifting to how to secure laptop networks and mobile configurations.

Read this full article at Carol Ellison

Only registered users can write comments.
Please login or register.

Powered by AkoComment!

 
< Prev   Next >
    
Partner

 

Latest Features
Peter Smith Releases Linux Network Security Online
Securing a Linux Web Server
Password guessing with Medusa 2.0
Password guessing as an attack vector
Squid and Digest Authentication
Squid and Basic Authentication
Demystifying the Chinese Hacking Industry: Earning 6 Million a Night
Free Online security course (LearnSIA) - A Call for Help
What You Need to Know About Linux Rootkits
Review: A Practical Guide to Fedora and Red Hat Enterprise Linux - Fifth Edition
Yesterday's Edition
Google Removes SSLv3 Fallback Support From Chrome
Hacker Lexicon: What Is End-to-End Encryption?
Partner Sponsor

Community | HOWTOs | Blogs | Features | Book Reviews | Networking
 Security Projects |  Latest News |  Newsletters |  SELinux |  Privacy |  Home
 Hardening |   About Us |   Advertise |   Legal Notice |   RSS |   Guardian Digital
(c)Copyright 2014 Guardian Digital, Inc. All rights reserved.