|
Linux more secure than Windows says study |
|
|
|
Source: TheInquirer.net - Posted by Benjamin D. Thomas
|
Another brown study in the Windows vs Linux security debate claims to prove that the Mighty Vole fudged things when it claimed that its software was more secure than Linux. The study, compiled by tech journalist Nicholas Petreley concludes that Microsoft's "Get The Facts" campaign does not deal with the "real facts." . . .
Another brown study in the Windows vs Linux security debate claims to prove that the Mighty Vole fudged things when it claimed that its software was more secure than Linux. The study, compiled by tech journalist Nicholas Petreley concludes that Microsoft's "Get The Facts" campaign does not deal with the "real facts." Before we go into details, we should point out that Petreley's former life includes editorial director of LinuxWorld. He is the author of the Official Fedora Companion and is co-writing Linux Desktop Hacks for O'Reilly [Oh really, Ed). Oh, and he sometimes flogs his penmanship to the Rogerister.
Read this full article at TheInquirer.net
Powered by AkoComment! |
