LinuxSecurity.com
Share your story
The central voice for Linux and Open Source security news
Home News Topics Advisories HOWTOs Features Newsletters About Register

Welcome!
Sign up!
EnGarde Community
Login
Polls
Is Mandatory Access Control Too Much Security For Enterprise's Linux?
 
Advisories
Community
Linux Events
Linux User Groups
Link to Us
Security Center
Book Reviews
Security Dictionary
Security Tips
SELinux
White Papers
Featured Blogs
Emily Ratliff: OS Security
DanWalsh LiveJournal
Security Bloggers Network
Latest Newsletters
Linux Advisory Watch: October 10th, 2008
Linux Security Week: October 6th, 2008
Subscribe
LinuxSecurity Newsletters
E-mail:
Choose Lists:
About our Newsletters
RSS Feeds
Get the LinuxSecurity news you want faster with RSS
Powered By

  
House of Representatives Signs on Digital Line Print E-mail
User Rating:      How can I rate this item?
Source: CNN.COM - Posted by LinuxSecurity.com Team   
Cryptography If you're anything like me, you probably hate having to sign things. I can certainly type far faster than I can write by hand, a habit which has reduced my signature to something akin to two squiggly lines. . . . If you're anything like me, you probably hate having to sign things. I can certainly type far faster than I can write by hand, a habit which has reduced my signature to something akin to two squiggly lines. The good news then, is that the House of Representatives has approved a Bill that would allow US consumers to electronically sign their names over the Internet, removing the need for handwritten signatures.

In California, as of January 1st of this year, you can legally sign a number of documents electronically (wills and trusts are excluded). The national version of the bill does not require any form of paper trail (in California companies still have to follow up certain important correspondeces with paper).

According to Gail Hillebrand of the U.S. Consumers Union, "The legal obligation is fulfilled when they e-mail it to you, but they do not have to have proof that you received it, and they don't have to have proof that you opened it or it got to you in some form."

The security implications of legalized digital signatures are significant. The concept certainly is nothing new, the ability to sign a digital document with a PGP signature has been around for a number of years. Of course, taking digital signatures into the realm of things like signing up for credit cards and loans is definately new territory. There will eventually need to be some formalized method of signing documents, authenticated those signatures and keeping others from being able to forge them.

Read this full article at CNN.COM

Write Comment
  • Please keep the topic of messages relevant to the subject of the article.
  • Personal verbal attacks will be deleted.
  • Please don't use comments to plug your web site.. Such material will be removed.
Name:
Title:
Comment:

Code:* Code

Powered by AkoComment!

 
< Prev   Next >
    
Partner:

 

Latest Features
Never Installed a Firewall on Ubuntu? Try Firestarter
Review: Hacking Exposed Linux, Third Edition
Security Features of Firefox 3.0
Review: The Book of Wireless
April 2008 Open Source Tool of the Month: sudo
Open Source Tool of March: ZoneMinder
Meet the Anti-Nmap: PSAD
Weekend Edition
Billy Hoffman On AJAX Security and Browser Attacks

QuickLinks: Comunity , HOWTOs , Blogs , Features , Book Reviews , Networking ,
  Security Projects ,   Latest News ,  Newsletters ,  SELinux ,  Privacy ,  Home,
 Hardening ,   About Us,   Advertise,   Legal Notice,   RSS,   Guardian Digital

(c)Copyright 2008 Guardian Digital, Inc. All rights reserved.