LinuxSecurity.com
Share your story
The central voice for Linux and Open Source security news
Home News Topics Advisories HOWTOs Features Newsletters About Register

Welcome!
Sign up!
EnGarde Community
Login
Polls
Is Mandatory Access Control Too Much Security For Enterprise's Linux?
 
Advisories
Community
Linux Events
Linux User Groups
Link to Us
Security Center
Book Reviews
Security Dictionary
Security Tips
SELinux
White Papers
Featured Blogs
Emily Ratliff: OS Security
DanWalsh LiveJournal
Security Bloggers Network
Latest Newsletters
Linux Advisory Watch: October 10th, 2008
Linux Security Week: October 6th, 2008
Subscribe
LinuxSecurity Newsletters
E-mail:
Choose Lists:
About our Newsletters
RSS Feeds
Get the LinuxSecurity news you want faster with RSS
Powered By

  
Symantec CEO hits out at Microsoft... and Linux Print E-mail
User Rating:      How can I rate this item?
Source: silicon.com - Posted by David Isecke   
Security Of course, John Thompson has a certain interest in Linux non-adoption, since NAV is one of the two major AV systems that does not support Linux, and since there have been so few Linux viruses. But if he were to be too positive about Microsoft's security, especially now that they've entered the anti-virus business, this would cut into Symantec's raison d'etre. In this article, besides the usual FUD in the article itself, there are some interesting comments that detail some of Linux's solid security advantages. . . . Symantec CEO John Thompson has hit out at "the myth" that Microsoft's operating system is inherently less secure than the open-source alternatives, which he likened to a "dead-end alley". However, he still had few kind words for the software giant.

Thompson believes the reason Microsoft is so often seen as culpable for virus outbreaks and security flaws is simply because it is the biggest target - though he admitted that if "things get too homogenised, it is not a good thing" - especially where security is concerned.

And while some believe Microsoft's move into the antivirus field, through acquisition, means it is best placed to heal its own wounds, Thompson is unconcerned, claiming Microsoft lacks the credentials to be taken seriously in the antivirus sector.

Read this full article at silicon.com

Write Comment
  • Please keep the topic of messages relevant to the subject of the article.
  • Personal verbal attacks will be deleted.
  • Please don't use comments to plug your web site.. Such material will be removed.
Name:
Title:
Comment:

Code:* Code

Powered by AkoComment!

 
< Prev   Next >
    
Partner:

 

Latest Features
Never Installed a Firewall on Ubuntu? Try Firestarter
Review: Hacking Exposed Linux, Third Edition
Security Features of Firefox 3.0
Review: The Book of Wireless
April 2008 Open Source Tool of the Month: sudo
Open Source Tool of March: ZoneMinder
Meet the Anti-Nmap: PSAD
Yesterday's Edition
Billy Hoffman On AJAX Security and Browser Attacks

QuickLinks: Comunity , HOWTOs , Blogs , Features , Book Reviews , Networking ,
  Security Projects ,   Latest News ,  Newsletters ,  SELinux ,  Privacy ,  Home,
 Hardening ,   About Us,   Advertise,   Legal Notice,   RSS,   Guardian Digital

(c)Copyright 2008 Guardian Digital, Inc. All rights reserved.