Share your story
The central voice for Linux and Open Source security news
Home News Topics Advisories HOWTOs Features Newsletters About Register

Sign up!
EnGarde Community
What is the most important Linux security technology?
Linux Events
Linux User Groups
Link to Us
Security Center
Book Reviews
Security Dictionary
Security Tips
White Papers
Featured Blogs
All About Linux
DanWalsh LiveJournal
Latest Newsletters
Linux Security Week: March 30th, 2015
Linux Advisory Watch: March 27th, 2015
LinuxSecurity Newsletters
Choose Lists:
About our Newsletters
RSS Feeds
Get the LinuxSecurity news you want faster with RSS
Powered By

NetBSD 1.3.3: Arp Problems Print E-mail
User Rating:      How can I rate this item?
Posted by Team   
NetBSD The implementation of ARP packet reception is vulnerable to two different attacks. On multihomed hosts ARP packets entries from wire A can overwrite entries from Wire B. For all hosts, ARP packets can overwrite entries marked as static.
You can find the find a C source code patch for the problem here.


                 NetBSD Security Advisory 1999-010

Topic:          ARP table vulnerability
Version:        NetBSD-1.3*
Severity:       Denial of service or traffic hijacking from local network
                cable is possible


The implementation of ARP packet reception is vulnerable two attacks:

        - on multihomed hosts, ARP packets from cable A can overwrite
          ARP entries for cable B.

        - for all hosts, ARP packets can overwrite ARP entries marked
          as static.

Technical Details

ARP is a protocol used to dynamically obtain IPv4 to Link level address
translation, used for Ethernet, FDDI, Token ring, and ARCnet cables, 
described in RFC 826.

The first vulnerability is specific to hosts with more than one ARP capable
network attached.  The address information of incoming ARP packets is not 
checked to ensure that it corresponds to one of the addresses of the
interface on which the packet arrived.  Thus, it would be able to suppress
or redirect traffic from the attacked host to a different destination.

The second vulnerability is related to so-called "static" arp entries.
The original NetBSD ARP implementation (as that of most other vendors)
allows the creation of "static" or "permanent" ARP entries.  They are
typically used for two reasons:

        - as a security measure, to disallow the redirection of traffic
          addressed to priviledged hosts by rogue hosts on the cable to
          themselves or elsewhere,

        - as a cheap routing protocol ("proxy ARP"), mostly when
          connecting single hosts through point to point links.  To the
          outside, they occur as if they where on the (e.g.) Ethernet, but
          traffic destined for them is redirected by the ARP mechanism to
          the routing host.

The 2nd usage doesn't create specific denial of service possibilities as
the ARP protocol is insecure in itself.

However, if static ARP entries are used to prevent D.O.S. attacks, they need
to be protected from overwriting.

Solutions and Workarounds

NetBSD-1.4, and NetBSD-1.4_BETA after 1999-05-05, are fixed.

A patch is available for NetBSD 1.3.3 to fix this problem.  You may
find this patch on the NetBSD ftp server:


NetBSD-current since 19990506 is not vulnerable.  Users of
NetBSD-current should upgrade to a source tree later than 19990506.

Thanks To

Both vulnerabilities were reported by Olaf "Rhialto" Seibert in NetBSD
PR 7489 and PR 7490.  A fix was provided by Zdenek Salvet in PR 7497,
and integrated into NetBSD by Ignatios Souvatzis.

Revision History

        1999/05/21 - initial version

More Information

Information about NetBSD and NetBSD security can be found at
http://www.NetBSD.ORG/ and http://www.NetBSD.ORG/Security/.

Copyright 1999, The NetBSD Foundation, Inc.  All Rights Reserved.

$NetBSD: NetBSD-SA1999-010.txt,v 1.3 1999/05/21 12:47:00 mrg Exp $

Version: 2.6.3ia
Charset: noconv

< Prev   Next >


Latest Features
Peter Smith Releases Linux Network Security Online
Securing a Linux Web Server
Password guessing with Medusa 2.0
Password guessing as an attack vector
Squid and Digest Authentication
Squid and Basic Authentication
Demystifying the Chinese Hacking Industry: Earning 6 Million a Night
Free Online security course (LearnSIA) - A Call for Help
What You Need to Know About Linux Rootkits
Review: A Practical Guide to Fedora and Red Hat Enterprise Linux - Fifth Edition
Weekend Edition
FBI Quietly Removes Recommendation To Encrypt Your Phone
And the prize for LEAST SECURE BROWSER goes to ... Chrome!
Partner Sponsor

Community | HOWTOs | Blogs | Features | Book Reviews | Networking
 Security Projects |  Latest News |  Newsletters |  SELinux |  Privacy |  Home
 Hardening |   About Us |   Advertise |   Legal Notice |   RSS |   Guardian Digital
(c)Copyright 2015 Guardian Digital, Inc. All rights reserved.